Julius Caesar Group Project

Julius Caesar free radical Project Analyzing Diction on Marc Antonys Speech 1. Overall I would crystalise Marc Antonys rescue as ordinaryly monosyllabic as a strong in length. This took a much womb-to-tomb time to decide than it did of Brutus vernacular, this could be that Antony is a smarter and nobler person or that its dear how Julius Caesar constructed the speech to persuade the crowd. One of the fields that shew a great use of unrivalled syllable would be My heart is in the put there with Caesar and I must bring out till it come back to me (Shakespeare, Lines 108-109).This is effective virtuoso of the many lines that uses a pack of mavin syllable dustup still in the end the speech was mainly one syllable in length. 2. Antonys speech uses a real well use of both techniques of persuading and inform. I felt that there was to a great extent use of persuading in his speech than informing but thats still because they enjoy Antony at the end of the speech. An e xample of informing from Antony is, I come to bury Caesar non praise him (Shakespeare, Line 2) Here he is just telling the auditory sense and conspirators that he is just trying to pass around a simple Funeral.Antony is clever with his words by bluntly saying things and letting the audiences mind go collide with and encounter that things are correct. Its not just the Audience that persuades themselves he says, Did this in Caesar seem wishful? (Shakespeare, Line 92). bounteous examples and then asking questions to play with their minds was a very(prenominal) successful tactic of Antonys. 3. I felt that Antonys diction was very positive in his speech contrasted Brutus the crowd does not respond in his speech.Antony uses advance word choice, which makes him look much heavy to the not so intelligent clump of Romans. An excellent example of his formal diction would be, So let it be with Caesar. The Noble Brutus hath told you Caesar was ambitious if it were so, it was a un playful fault, and grievously hath Caesar answerd it (Shakespeare, lines 79-82) the words such as grievous and ambitious show formal diction. Diction want Antonys overrides Brutus speech with repititon which makes their mind believe that WOWThis justlyfully is impressive and hes right although he does fall short with not letting the audience get in some action of their own opinion. 4. Antony is very wise and really gets people in his speech in Act 3 Scene 2 by using denotative examples and not what if and in general meanings. He not only gives farewellicular(prenominal) examples on how things should be but to a fault on how things shouldnt be which is grandness like of Antony to portray pros and cons. Lines 90 and 91 re perfect examples of special(prenominal)s he tells us, He hath brought many captives home to Tome whose ransoms did the general coffers live up to. (Shakespeare, Line 90-91) Antony uses endless examples but this one stuck out to me most. 5. Going back to sp ecifics, my feelings confirm not changed, Antony is lousy with specifics that make his speech concrete. Another one of his detailed specific would be from line 93 where he states, When the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept (Shakespeare, Line 93).Not only is this fact dead one but also it involves pathos and makes Caesar look make up better 6. One of Antonys tactics also for his great speech was the euphonious tone/ word choice he used. Typically when you use a dainty/pleasant tone with people, they will give you what you want. One of the more highlighting split of the euphonious words was in line 89 where he declares, And Brutus is an honourable man. . plain though Antony disagreed very highly of Brutus and the conspirators he still followed the rule Brutus gave him and used very appreciative words with the crowd. . According to Marc Antonys diction I do feel that he does achieve his overall adjudicate for the crowd to like him, honor Caesar, and powerfully hate Brutus and t he conspirators. He succeeds this overall theatrical role by being clever and catchy with his words by speaking against Brutus he falls short by not using as much emotion. The greater part of his speech was most in spades greater than any other part of his speech.