Two Perspectives on the Medieval Church

Two Perspectives on the Medieval churchIt is often said that the church service during the positions Ages was grasping and scotch. When making this statement, many people use writings from that era, such(prenominal) as the works of Chaucer, to substantiate their claim. While literary productions quarter often reflect what life was like passim recital, it basis also distort reality and alter narration check to the author?s personal feelings and bias toward the decree in which they lived. It is because of this that many people claim that the Church was non as corrupt as is often claimed. One such person who holds this opinion is Assistant Professor of medieval history at Calvin College, MI., Frans van Liere. Van Liere claims the argument that the Medieval Church was corrupt is an exaggerated myth, perpetuated by historical fallacies. In The excuser?s Tale, the reader is introduced to the concept of religious corruption. This is done by dint of the story coitus of a ?forgiver? (one who sold indulgences), who reveals to the reader that he is actually a corrupt hypocrite. Asked by the army to tell a ? bright? tale to the group, the Pardoner tells of how he preaches about morality, while at the same time admitting to creation a drunk. By this point, the reader is led to intrust that this is emblematic of the Medieval Church and its double standards.

The Pardoner continues his story, telling of how he sells promises of salvation while asking for money in return. Again, this is a reference to the Church?s use of indulgences during the Middle Ages. The Pardoner tells the group of a Flemish people haunt with inebriation and indulgin! g in excess. Denouncing this behavior, the Pardoner then admits to gentle in it himself. Clearly, Chaucer is making a statement: the Church was nix much than corrupt, hypocritical and abounding... If you want to get a full essay, station it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper