Dworkins Belief Of Preferential Treatment :: essays research papers

Dworkins Belief of invidious Treatment     For umteen years, discriminative interference has been used to try to make upfor past wrong-doings to minorities. thither have been many cases tried overracial discrimination, with verdicts of both clean-handed and guilty. RonaldDworkin attempts to argue that preferential treatment is socially useful and atthe like time does not violate peoples rights. This is wrong for many reasonshere I shall illustrate how preferential treatment hinders racial equality,violates peoples rights, and can lead to a lower opinion toward a particularrace.     Dworkin believes that continuing preferential treatment will decreaseracial thought and the importance of race. This is the total diametrical ofwhat truly happens. If a person were to consider Americas past, as an example,he would imbibe how racially diverse people were. Now look around. Just goacross any given ara, groups of people of the same race are s een walkingtogether. Most people do not notice this, exclusively very rarely are groups ofethnically diverse people seen. Although in that location are no longer any laws statingthat there must be a separation between different races, people til now designit unconsciously. Dworkin states that the long-term goal of preferentialtreatment "is to reduce the degree to which American society is overall aracially conscious society (294)." Preferential treatment does nothing of thesort. It was used widely in the past and still exists in some areas today. Ithas not reduced racial consciousness, but change magnitude it by making people thinkmore about how many spaces are reserved for their particular race. Instead,people should think of what their chances are of getting something on account oftheir personal knowledge over some adept elses, not even considering their race asa factor. This is evident in a blacks point of view of getting into the health check school of the Universi ty of California at Davis. Sixteen places are setaside just for blacks and other minorities, no matter how low their test scoresare. That way, minorities dont even have to apprehension about competing with whitesfor a position. This does not, in any way, reduce racial consciousness bysetting two tracks for admission to medical school, one for the minorities, andone for the majority.     Mr. Dworkin supports the idea that preferential treatment does notviolate peoples rights. His argument is clean here because he attempts to provethis by saying that if two things do not violate peoples rights, then neitherdoes a third. The two things that supposedly do not violate rights are thedenial of someone to medical school because of their age and because their test