the problem of evil Essay -- essays research papers

Studies in the Philosophy of ReligionTHE PROBLEM OF hellishdeity is the omnipotent and tout ensemble good creator of all thingsThere is slimy in the initiationa) EXPLAIN THESE TWO STATEMENTS AND SHOW WHY THEY ARE SAID TO BE CONTRADICTORY (20)The problem of evil is usually seen as the problem of how the founding of divinity commode be reconciled with the existence of evil in the world. Its regarded as a logical problem, because it is based on the fronting contradiction involved in holding onto three incompatible article of beliefs. This macrocosm that God is omnipotent, that God is wholly good and that evil exists in the world. The incident that evil exists in the world constitutes the most common objection to the belief in the existence of the omnipotent (all powerful), omniscient (all chouseing) and all loving God of Classical Theism. Classical Theism is the traditional understanding of God as revere by Christians, Jews and Muslims. This definition is initially critic ised, for being culture-bound, as other religions much(prenominal) as Hinduism and Buddhism dont believe in one God so cant be applied to their respective religions. and then the problem of evil is only a problem for followers of a theistic religion.God is described as an infinite, self-existent, incorporeal (without body), eternal, immut sufficient (doesnt change), impassable (incapable of trauma), simple (one entity), undefiled (God is seen as a morally perfect being i.e. wholly good), omniscient (all knowing) and omnipotent (all powerful) being. Omnipotence means being able to bring about anything which it is logically possible to bring about. However non being able to bring about that which is logically out(predicate) is non a restriction on omnipotence since the logically impossible is non a characterisation of anything. It is a non-thing. Evil is said to come from the free actions of compassionate beings. God cant do whats logically impossible and its said to be logic ally impossible for God to develop humans who are free but always choose to do whats right. This in that respectfore takes the responsibility of evil from God.Omniscience means knowing everything that it is logically possible to know. If God knows everything it is not possible for him to think of something he does not know. This raises the question of whether God knows every little fact does he know what youre thinking or what youre going to do? If so then if hes omnipotent shouldn... ...d that finding good consequences in bad things is a horrible idea.DOES IRENAEUS APPROACH SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF EVIL?There are many instances of good being brought out of evil through a persons reaction to it, however there are many other cases where the opposite has occurred. Sometimes obstacles result in ones character being strengthened but other times they can be crushing leading to ones character being diminished and unexpended incompetent so unable to grow and develop further. So it would se em any soul making is subject to an individuals personality and particular way of dealing with a problem. Therefore this doesnt bear away the contradiction, because theres evidence of throng suffering and not acquiring better after it. This produces more problems as shows God to be selecting people who he should know would suffer immensely because of this evil. Irenaeus approach takes the file sullen God for human suffering. This is what is needed to solve the problem of evil. He places the blame on human free will therefore avoiding questions of Gods nature so in essence removing the contradiction. People accept that suffering is there for a reason and its part of Gods plan for soul making.